Alliance Alert: The Alliance for Rights and Recovery shares the serious concerns raised by the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law regarding a recent initiative by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Justice to increase the use of guardianship for homeless veterans receiving services in VA hospitals.
According to the announcement, VA attorneys will be appointed as Special Assistant United States Attorneys to petition courts for guardianship over certain homeless veterans who are currently receiving services in VA facilities. The stated goal is to address situations where veterans are believed to lack the capacity to make decisions. However, advocates and legal experts have raised important questions about whether the underlying issue is actually a lack of community-based services and housing rather than a lack of decision-making capacity.
The Alliance agrees with the Bazelon Center鈥檚 assessment that the primary reason people remain in psychiatric hospitals or institutional settings is often the lack of accessible housing and adequate community mental health services. When individuals cannot access stable housing, peer support, case management, and other voluntary services in the community, discharge from institutional settings becomes extremely difficult. Expanding the use of guardianship risks shifting the focus away from solving these systemic problems.
We believe the federal government should prioritize investments in community mental health services, supportive housing, and voluntary recovery-oriented supports that help veterans live successfully in their communities. Veterans who have served our country deserve policies that strengthen their independence, dignity, and ability to make decisions about their own lives, not policies that remove their decision-making authority.
Guardianship should always be considered a last resort. Expanding its use without first addressing the lack of housing and services risks increasing institutionalization and undermining the civil rights of veterans with mental health disabilities. Instead of expanding guardianship, the federal government should focus on building the community-based infrastructure that allows veterans to transition safely out of institutional settings and thrive in their own homes and communities.
Those interested in learning more about federal policy developments like this one and how advocates and providers can respond are encouraged to register for the Alliance鈥檚 upcoming Executive Seminar. The event will provide a deeper look at federal policy changes affecting mental health and substance use services and offer strategies for leaders and advocates in 黑料不打烊 to mitigate potential harms and push for reforms that strengthen community-based supports.
Register Today:
Statement of the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law on Veterans’ Affairs-Department of Justice Initiative to Strip Rights from Homeless Veterans
March 11, 2026 – We are gravely concerned about the Department of Veterans鈥 Affairs鈥 new initiative seeking to place hundreds of homeless veterans under guardianship. , the VA and the Justice Department have entered an agreement to appoint VA lawyers to serve as Special Assistant United States Attorneys and petition for appointment of guardians for homeless veterans in VA hospitals. While the VA claims that these veterans are stuck in VA hospitals because they lack capacity to make health care decisions, it is far more likely that these veterans are stuck because of the lack of community mental health services and housing.
鈥淚n our experience, the reasons that people sit in psychiatric hospitals or wards waiting to be discharged is almost always that there are not sufficient community services or housing,鈥 said Jennifer Mathis, Deputy Director of the Bazelon Center. 鈥淭he VA’s new initiative will do little to solve the underlying problems facing homeless veterans with mental health disabilities. The VA should focus on ensuring that the veterans it is responsible for serving have the help they need to live and thrive in their own homes and communities rather than trying to strip them of their right to make decisions.鈥
The VA鈥檚 claim that hundreds of homeless veterans have been languishing in its hospitals due to their inability to make health care decisions raises an obvious question鈥攊f that were true, how has the VA been discharging its responsibility to provide them with services until now if they lack the capacity to consent to treatment?
Without sufficient housing and services to serve these veterans in the community, guardians are likely to seek their placement in institutional facilities, even if they could be served in their own homes. In December 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that the VA was discriminating based on disability under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by failing to serve homeless veterans with mental illnesses in West Los Angeles in the most integrated setting appropriate. The court affirmed the conclusion that the VA had placed veterans at serious risk of institutionalization by failing to provide them with the community services and supported housing that they needed, and kept in place a court order directing the VA to create thousands of units of supportive housing for these veterans. It appears that the VA’s new initiative to seek guardianship for hundreds of homeless veterans is an effort to avoid providing the community services and housing that veterans want and to have them placed in congregate settings instead. That would be bad policy and would violate the law.
YOUR SUPPORT IS NEEDED
The Bazelon Center relies on contributions from our allies to ensure that our staff can fight for protections and services for people with mental disabilities. Please consider making a gift today.